It's one of those things that sounds like an incidental feature until you pop off a few shots at a tank then hide in a building – at which point the tank's driver, quite sensibly, fires at the wall and takes you and the house with it. The key feature is destructibility any structure can be chipped away by gunfire or blown apart by explosions. Still: who cares? Battlefield has a singleplayer campaign because it has to have one, but this series is so loved because of multiplayer. The template for this stuff is 2007's Modern Warfare, and despite BF4's near-constant spectacle, the years have not been kind. Firing the guns feels great, but the entire exercise has an air of redundancy – enemy behaviour you've seen before, scene ideas you've played before, and even the seemingly-obligatory torture scene. The best you can say is it's a well-executed take on this generation's familiar FPS cliches, until an abrupt and disappointing multiple-choice ending. Housekeeping first though, because the singleplayer campaign isn't one of them. Multi-kill! Taking out enemies this way is one of the many reasons Battlefield 4 is amazing. Too low the blades hit a tree, I lost control, grunts scattered below, and the ground span wildly – dead.
This is the life, I thought, lazily hovering towards an enemy squad. On lucky number three, I flew that bird as god intended, making long sweeps around hotspots and waiting for Wagner to kick in. On attempt two, I got airborne before landing in the ocean. T he first time I tried to fly a helicopter, a few good men died on the landing pad.
0 kommentar(er)
